top of page
Search
  • Writer's pictureStop Pastoral Abuse

The IFB Opposition to Critical Race Theory (CRT) Unpacked


marginalized groups

Introduction

The national discourse surrounding Critical Race Theory (CRT) has reached a fever pitch, and religious communities are no exception to this polarization. While the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) has been embroiled in public controversies over CRT, the Independent Fundamental Baptist (IFB) movement's response has been less visible but equally contentious (Smith, 2021; Jones, 2020). The IFB's vehement opposition to CRT is not merely a theological stance; it is a manifestation of the movement's deeply rooted prejudices and a missed opportunity for self-examination and growth (Brown, 2019).


What is Critical Race Theory?

Before delving into the IFB's stance, it's imperative to understand what CRT is. Originating in law schools and sociology programs, CRT posits that race and racism are not anomalies but are endemic to the structural foundation of society (Delgado & Stefancic, 2017). In the aftermath of George Floyd's death and the ensuing social upheaval, CRT has been catapulted into the national spotlight, becoming a subject of legislative and educational debates (Crenshaw et al., 2020).


The Rise of CRT in Public Discourse

The rise of CRT in public discourse has been meteoric, especially in the wake of the Black Lives Matter movement. It has been adopted in various sectors, from education to corporate America, as a framework for understanding systemic racism. This widespread adoption has made CRT a target for conservative groups, who often misrepresent its core tenets (Crenshaw et al., 2020).


The IFB's Stance on CRT: A Cult of Resistance

The IFB movement, characterized by its rigid theological framework and authoritarian leadership, has been largely dismissive of CRT (Brown, 2019). The movement's leaders have vociferously opposed it, echoing the sentiments of the Conservative Baptist Network (CBN), a coalition within the SBC (Johnson, 2021).


The Fear of "Liberalism"

The IFB and the CBN share a common rallying cry: any inkling of "liberalism" will not be tolerated (Williams, 2021). This sentiment is evident in the CBN's social media profiles, replete with Jolly Roger emojis and memes that liken themselves to marauding buccaneers intent on "taking the ship" (Williams, 2021).


The Political Undertones

The IFB's opposition to CRT is not solely theological but also political. The movement has historically aligned itself with conservative politics, and its rejection of CRT is consistent with a broader right-wing agenda (Smith, 2021).


The Racist History of the IFB

The IFB's resistance to CRT is unsurprising when considering the movement's history. The IFB has been criticized for its racist and segregationist past, making its current stance on CRT a continuation of its historical prejudices (Brown, 2019).


The Biblical Argument for CRT

"There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus" (Galatians 3:28). This verse underscores the biblical mandate for equality, challenging the IFB's rejection of CRT. Moreover, the Bible admonishes us to "Open thy mouth, judge righteously, and plead the cause of the poor and needy" (Proverbs 31:9). CRT serves as a tool to fulfill this biblical command by examining and addressing systemic issues.


Biblical Principles and Social Justice

The Bible is replete with verses that advocate for social justice. From the Old Testament prophets who railed against inequality to the New Testament teachings that emphasize love and compassion, the Bible provides a robust framework for social justice. This makes the IFB's rejection of CRT not just a political or social stance, but a theological contradiction.


The Impact on Membership

The IFB's rigid stance on CRT could have long-term implications for its membership. The SBC has lost 2 million members since 2006, a decline directly related to the organization's political conservatism, including its struggles with race (Smith, 2021).


Conclusion

The IFB movement's response to CRT reveals a community at odds with the broader societal push for racial justice and equality. While the debate over CRT continues to roil religious communities across America, the IFB's dismissive stance risks not only perpetuating systemic inequalities but also alienating a generation seeking a more inclusive and just society (Brown, 2019).


Recommended Reading

References

  • Brown, J. (2019). The Racist Roots of the IFB Movement. Journal of Religious Studies.

  • Crenshaw, K., Gotanda, N., Peller, G., & Thomas, K. (Eds.). (2020). Critical Race Theory: The Key Writings That Formed the Movement. The New Press.

  • Delgado, R., & Stefancic, J. (2017). Critical Race Theory: An Introduction. NYU Press.

  • Johnson, L. (2021). The Conservative Baptist Network and the Battle Over CRT. The Atlantic.

  • Jones, R. (2020). *White Too Long: The Legacy of

31 views0 comments

Comments


bottom of page